
Let's have a discussion. I want some insight and perspective with this.
I've been thinking a lot lately about my 'style', and the fact that a lot of successful artists are known for 'their style'. Part of this makes me question what my style is, and what I need to do to exploit it. I sat down the other day and wrote down a list of possible lines that my work could be titled as. There's like 7 different lines I could have within my work. That's not exactly conducive to being able to concentrate on something and expand on it. So now...what do I look at?
Do I look at what I love, and how production-oriented it is? Do I select a certain number of aspects and focus in?
I read a great article from Metalsmith on Heather White Van Stolk (Metalsmith, Summer 2006, Vol. 26 No. 2) and was fascinated with her evolution of work. It was inspiring, to say the least.
I have always wanted to make work that I am attracted to. That makes my heart tighten and tingle like other artists' work does. Some of what I'm making right now is just for sell-ability, and not necessarily from my heart. It doesn't necessarily say "Catherine Chandler"...at all. I feel like I'm at a turning point. Of course I want to make things that sell, but I don't want to sell out.
I'm wondering what has worked for other artists, in a way. Do they still experiment on the side, learn new techniques to add to their style, while at the same time producing work for galleries in their signature style? Do they feel they've given up something by concentrating on a fewer number of techniques?